<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Closed messaging revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briansim.com/blog/closed-messaging-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briansim.com/blog/closed-messaging-revisited/</link>
	<description>Version 6.0 (Slightly worse than v5.1)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 02:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://briansim.com/blog/closed-messaging-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansim.com/blog/2007/10/03/closed-messaging-revisited/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>&gt; Best of all, my social network now becomes a great white-list filter to avoid spam.

Yes. It brings the standard address book to life, which is where Plaxo sort of seems like it&#039;s going.

&gt; Problem with email though, is it’s extremely boring

Which is fine, because the messaging component is only one feature within the larger SNS environment - a purely utilitarian feature. So I guess that would be another reason for email providers to partner, in order to improve the quality, as well as quantity, of engagement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Best of all, my social network now becomes a great white-list filter to avoid spam.</p>
<p>Yes. It brings the standard address book to life, which is where Plaxo sort of seems like it&#8217;s going.</p>
<p>&gt; Problem with email though, is it’s extremely boring</p>
<p>Which is fine, because the messaging component is only one feature within the larger SNS environment &#8211; a purely utilitarian feature. So I guess that would be another reason for email providers to partner, in order to improve the quality, as well as quantity, of engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://briansim.com/blog/closed-messaging-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briansim.com/blog/2007/10/03/closed-messaging-revisited/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Another nice thing about eMail apart from its external communications, and archival, is that you can have multiple identities/profiles one for each of your life, and all integrated within one InBox. Actually it&#039;s only aggregated, rather than integrated. Best of all, my social network now becomes a great white-list filter to avoid spam.

Problem with email though, is it&#039;s extremely boring. The entire metaphor is folder/information centric, and not people centric - and definitely not me-centric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another nice thing about eMail apart from its external communications, and archival, is that you can have multiple identities/profiles one for each of your life, and all integrated within one InBox. Actually it&#8217;s only aggregated, rather than integrated. Best of all, my social network now becomes a great white-list filter to avoid spam.</p>
<p>Problem with email though, is it&#8217;s extremely boring. The entire metaphor is folder/information centric, and not people centric &#8211; and definitely not me-centric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
